So easily tracking all this and knowing what shots have been used in which projects, so we don't reuse for the same audience too frequently. I'm still using HD footage from 10 years back in some projects. All our new footage gets used for the particular project at hand, but then also reused over and over for other projects. My limited understanding with MAMs is that they use some kind of XML sidecar, so the metadata is not often readable outside their dedicated program. If I understand correctly the program actually puts all the FCPX metadata as Finder tags so it's directly connected to each clip of media. I stumbled on FindrCat Pro several weeks ago and wondered about implementing that regardless of what we do. Note Spotlight indexing may have limitations on a NAS drive and is not designed for intermittently-connected cloud assets. ![]() It's probably possible to subsequently index those with NeoFinder, producing a searchable database of offline media: /guide/8/8.7/neofinder_tags.html Theoretically you save FCPX keywords and ratings across multiple libraries using FindrCat, but it would assume those datasets were always on line. I don't remember if Frame.io or KeyFlow Pro do that. Ideally you'd like a cross-library MAM workflow extension which preserved FCPX's range-based tagging. I think FindrCat and Spotlight indexing are all clip-based. Using this method you'd curate, rate and keyword imported media within a given FCPX library, then export using FindrCat which preserves those as Finder tags on the media files, making them searchable using the MacOS Spotlight indexing system.ĭata organization using the FCPX rating and keywording system is heavily range-based, not just clip-based. I think Frame.io or KeyFlow Pro give that, but you can do it yourself manually with the inexpensive tool FindrCat. What you'd ideally like is cross-library searching. KeyFlow Pro 2: See also PostLab: /postlab/conceptsįCPX by itself is really good at data organization but scope is limited to a single library. However you don't necessarily need these and can "roll your own" collaborative system, but at a possibly significant cost in investigative and testing time. ![]() There are now FCPX workflow extensions that integrate and provide MAM capabilities. Wondering what others are using that you feel is a good marriage between FCPX and the MAM? Would like a system that doesn't nickel and dime you to death. We want to work off our internal Windows server currently (a MacMini server in-between is fine), then eventually migrate to the cloud, once pricing has dropped to fit our budget. Our setup is currently one editor with a second one in place in the next year or two. As I look more at the rich metadata within Final Cut, I don't see much out there so far that has a really good ability to read/write FCPX metadata. budget non-profit, for a media asset management system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |